返回信息流English skills are usually meansured in terms of Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing (LSRW). I do well believe that most English learners have pains in improving any of LSRW. So do I!
The origin of pains, I think, comes from the establishment of an unreasonable objective. I find I was obssessed with many unreasonable objectives I set to myself in the past. "Roma is not bulit in one day". The same principle can also be applied to English study. For example, if you are not a broadcaster or a host of a show, you do not necessarily need to master standard pronunication. Of course, you can set your goal as possession of a fluent and elegant spoken English. But it shall be after you master LSRW to a certain degree.
Vocabulary has a very close link to LSRW. But it does not mean the more the better because indescriminate memorization of words and phrases is significantly time consuming. We need to consider the input and output efficiency. I think the vocabulary can be classified into two categories, daily vocabulary and professional vocabulary. Be remember that you don't need to compel yourself to memorize all words, becase on one hand there are too many, one the other hand you will forget many of them if you seldom use them.
Not to be stricted with yourself on grammar in spoken English. Speaking is quite different from writting. It requires your quick mind to comprehend what has been heard and constuct sentences to express. Compared to grammar in spoken English, correct communication of your opinions is much more important. In addition, you shall not mind your accent/dialect unless it affects the correct conveyance of your opinions.
Listening is quite a headache. Several factors matters, including speaker's accent, content of speaking, degree of your familarity with the content, your vacabulary etc. I am absolutely sure that you have experience that listening skill becomes worse or better when listening to different listening materal.
这是一条镜像帖。来源：北邮人论坛 / english-bar / #56672同步于 2010/12/23
该镜像源已超过 30 天没有更新，可能在源站已被删除。
EnglishBar机器人发帖
As to ENGLISH STUDY
mirror
2010/12/23镜像同步6 回复
订阅后，新回复会通过你的通知中心匿名送达。
6 条回复
Should I paste my replies to this article here?
【 在 mirror 的大作中提到: 】
:
: English skills are usually meansured in terms of Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing (LSRW). I do well believe that most English learners have pains in improving any of LSRW. So do I!
: The origin of pains, I think, comes from the establishment of an unreasonable objective. I find I was obssessed with many unreasonable objectives I set to myself in the past. "Roma is not bulit in one day". The same principle can also be applied to English study. For example, if you are not a broadcaster or a host of a show, you do not necessarily need to master standard pronunication. Of course, you can set your goal as possession of a fluent and elegant spoken English. But it shall be after you master LSRW to a certain degree.
: ...................
Not necessarily to do that.
【 在 talisa 的大作中提到: 】
: Should I paste my replies to this article here?
: you master LSRW to a certain degree.
U mean not necessary to do that
【 在 mirror (井底之蛙) 的大作中提到: 】
: Not necessarily to do that.
Not quite sure.
Any difference between "you are not necessary to do that" and "you are not necessarily to do that"?? The "be to do" can also mean future tense.
【 在 Canda 的大作中提到: 】
: U mean not necessary to do that
I think
Canda means
a adj. is needed in "be not ___ to do that ", not a adv.