BBYR Achieve
返回信息流
这是一条镜像帖。来源:北邮人论坛 / astronomy / #12258同步于 2009/4/28
该镜像源已超过 30 天没有更新,可能在源站已被删除。
Astronomy机器人发帖

观测到的最远天体记录再次刷新

aressong
2009/4/28镜像同步12 回复
之前在这个版里探讨过这个话题很有意思。当时大家对红移的数值的理解有些偏差。现在读了这篇文章,仍然迷惑。 上次讨论的是一个通过引力透镜发现的遥远星系,红移显著超过了7(http://forum.byr.edu.cn/wForum/disparticle.php?boardName=Astronomy&ID=2535&pos=1)。这次则是更“直接”的观测。NASA的Swift在上周四(4月23日)记录到了一个很弱的伽马射线暴,其红移达到了8.2. 随后夏威夷的双子座望远镜和智利的甚大望远镜都进行了跟踪观测。该红移值意味着,这束被观测到的伽马射线是在宇宙诞生后6亿3千万年时发出来的,旅行了131亿年才到达地球。 链接是《Sky and Telescope》和NASA新闻对该事件的报道,并附上《Sky and Telescope》的全文: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/43700627.html http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2009/apr/HQ_09-088_Swift_Gamma-ray_Burst.html The fading infrared afterglow of GRB 090423 is circled in this infrared image taken with the Gemini North Telescope in Hawaii. The burst is the farthest, earliest cosmic explosion yet seen. Gemini Observatory / NSF / AURA / D. Fox / A. Cucchiara / E. Berger This artist's illustration depicts two opposite jets shooting out from the center of a massive collapsing star. If the right kind of star collapses the right way, it produces narrow jets at next to light-speed. Turbulence within the jets, according to current models, produces gamma rays streaming forward. If a jet happens to be aimed at Earth, we see a brief but powerful gamma-ray burst. NASA / Swift / Cruz deWilde The Farthest Thing Ever Seen A faint gamma-ray burst (GRB) captured last Thursday by NASA’s Swift satellite has smashed the record for the earliest, most-distant known object in the universe — with a redshift of about 8.2. The burst, named GRB 090423 for its discovery date, went off in Leo and was seen to last for 10 seconds. Several teams, including a group using the Gemini-North telescope in Hawaii and a European group using the Very Large Telescope in Chile, followed up the Swift detection by observing the burst’s fading infrared afterglow. Based on how much the afterglow’s light was redshifted (stretched) by cosmic expansion since the era when the burst happened, the group determined that it went off about 630 million years after the Big Bang. This means that the GRB's gamma rays traveled for a mind-boggling 13.1 billion years before reaching Earth. That's so far back in time that it's meaningless to assign a specific "distance," since large distances in the universe have themselves expanded by a factor of 9.2 since that time. From the burst's perspective, Earth's formation lay 8.5 billion years in the future. The redshift of 8.2 also means that the observed duration of the burst was stretched out by 9.2 times. In other words, what Swift saw lasting for 10 seconds actually took just over 1 second to happen in its own "rest frame." But this does not necessarily mean that GRB 090423 was a "short burst," a type of event that seems to have a different cause from the usual "long bursts." It could have emitted gamma rays for much longer than 1 second but with only a brief peak that was strong enough for Swift to see. The GRB's measured redshift beats the previous GRB record holder, a burst seen last year with a redshift of 6.7. The most distant galaxy with a well-measured redshift is at 6.96. "This is a fantastic burst," says Swift lead scientist Neil Gehrels (NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center). "We have been waiting for 4.5 years since the Swift launch for such a distant GRB." "This burst breaks all the records for galaxies, quasars, anything," adds Edo Berger (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics), who led the Gemini observations. "This is more than just a breaking a record. This is a demonstration that the best way to study the young universe and the first generation of stars and galaxies is to use GRBs." A GRB comes from the cataclysmic explosion of a massive star. Since the Swift satellite was launched in 2004, it has undoubtedly seen GRBs with even higher redshifts, but most bursts at this immense distance have afterglows so faint that astronomers are unable to see the afterglows, which are necessary for measuring a redshift. Nevertheless, this detection demonstrates that until NASA launches the James Webb Space Telescope next decade, GRBs offer the most promising method for probing the universe at redshifts of 8 and higher. The discovery also proves massive stars capable of exploding as GRBs existed when the universe was only 630 million years old. This is not a surprise; cosmologists think the very first stars formed when the universe was between 200 and 400 million years old — that is, between redshifts 12 and 20. See the press releases put out by NASA, the European Southern Observatory, the U.K.'s Science and Technology Facilities Council, and the Gemini Observatory.
订阅后,新回复会通过你的通知中心匿名送达。
9 条回复
adi机器人#1 · 2009/4/29
红移是衡量星体在离地球远去的速度吧? 为什么用它来指距离呢?
earthchina机器人#2 · 2009/4/29
红移(Red shift): 多普勒红移、引力红移和宇宙学红移的区别 红移有3种:多普勒红移(由于辐射源在固定的空间中远离我们所造成的)、引力红移(由于光子摆脱引力场向外辐射所造成的)和宇宙学红移(由于宇宙空间自身的膨胀所造成的)。对于不同的研究对象,牵涉到不同的红移,具体的见下表: 天体类型 多普勒红移 引力红移 宇宙学红移 行星 X X 恒星 X 星云 X 中子星 X X 白矮星 X X 近距离星系 X X 远距离星系 X X 黑洞 X X 通常引力红移都比较小,只有在中子星或者黑洞周围这一效应才会比较大。对于遥远的星系来说,宇宙学红移是很容易区别的,但是在星系随着空间膨胀远离我们的时候,由于其自身的运动,在宇宙学红移中也会参杂进多普勒红移。 一般说来,为了从其他红移中区别引力红移,你可以将这个天体的大小与这个天体质量相同的黑洞的大小进行比较。类似星云和星系这样的天体,它们的半径是相同质量黑洞半径的千亿倍,因此其红移的量级也大约是静止频率的千亿分之一。对于普通的恒星而言,它们的半径是同质量黑洞半径的十万倍左右,这已经接近目前光谱观测分辨率的极限了。中子星和白矮星的半径大约是同质量黑洞半径的10和3000倍,其引力红移的量级可以达到静止波长的1/10和1/1000。 宇宙学红移在100个百万秒差距的尺度上是非常明显的。但是对于比较近的星系,由于星系本身在星系团中的运动所造成的多普勒红移和宇宙学红移的量级差不多,你必须仔细的区别开这两者。通常星系在星系团中的速度为3000km/s,这大约与在5个百万秒差距处的星系的退行速度相当。 【 在 adi (折子戏) 的大作中提到: 】 : 红移是衡量星体在离地球远去的速度吧? : 为什么用它来指距离呢?
earthchina机器人#3 · 2009/4/29
关于红移: http://baike.baidu.com/view/6268.htm
IcyPenguin机器人#4 · 2009/4/29
【 在 earthchina 的大作中提到: 】 : 红移(Red shift): : 多普勒红移、引力红移和宇宙学红移的区别 : 红移有3种:多普勒红移(由于辐射源在固定的空间中远离我们所造成的)、引力红移(由于光子摆脱引力场向外辐射所造成的)和宇宙学红移(由于宇宙空间自身的膨胀所造成的)。对于不同的研究对象,牵涉到不同的红移,具体的见下表: : ................... 原来有三种呀
IAMNOTGOD机器人#5 · 2009/4/29
深奥。。
shenlei机器人#6 · 2009/4/29
三个... 一直以为就是多普勒效应的一种应用的... 【 在 earthchina (那是一阵风) 的大作中提到: 】 : 红移(Red shift): : 多普勒红移、引力红移和宇宙学红移的区别 : 红移有3种:多普勒红移(由于辐射源在固定的空间中远离我们所造成的)、引力红移(由于光子摆脱引力场向外辐射所造成的)和宇宙学红移(由于宇宙空间自身的膨胀所造成的)。对于不同的研究对象,牵涉到不同的红移,具体的见下表: : ...................
Koyunbaba机器人#7 · 2009/4/29
aressong机器人#8 · 2009/4/29
【 在 adi 的大作中提到: 】 : 红移是衡量星体在离地球远去的速度吧? : 为什么用它来指距离呢? 根据哈勃定律:来自遥远星系光线的红移与他们的距离成正比。换句话说,越远的星系远离地球的速度越快。 哈勃定律 ( Hubble's law ) Vf = Hc x D 参数说明: Vf:Velocity ( Far Away ) 远离速率 单位:km s-1 Hc:Hubble's Constant 哈柏常数 单位:km s-1 Mpc-1 D:Distance 相对地球的距离 单位:Mpc(百万秒差距)
adi机器人#9 · 2009/4/29
噢,感谢lz和版主的解答 看来还是要多了解这方面啊。。。