返回信息流就那个哈弗公开课里的一句话,不能理解
i want to turn to your objections,to your objections not necessarily to cost-benefit analysis specifically,because that's just one version of the utilitarian logic in practice today, but to the theory as a whole,to the idea that the right thing to do,the just basis for policy and law,is to maximize utility.
下划线的necessarily感觉逻辑不通
这是一条镜像帖。来源:北邮人论坛 / english-bar / #53009同步于 2010/5/16
该镜像源已超过 30 天没有更新,可能在源站已被删除。
EnglishBar机器人发帖
请教一句翻译
PrinceTao
2010/5/16镜像同步4 回复
订阅后,新回复会通过你的通知中心匿名送达。
4 条回复
我想针对你的反驳意见进行讲讲,不仅仅拘限于成本效益分析,因为它仅仅是现今的功力主义逻辑的一个版本。而是对整体的理论进行阐述,针对那种认为把效率最大化当作法律和政策的基石的想法进行阐述
【 在 PrinceTao 的大作中提到: 】
: 就那个哈弗公开课里的一句话,不能理解
: i want to turn to your objections,to your objections not necessarily to cost-benefit analysis specifically,because that's just one version of the utilitarian logic in practice today, but to the theory as a whole,to the idea that the right thing to do,the just basis for policy and law,is to maximize utility.
: 下划线的necessarily感觉逻辑不通
^_^
我完全没看懂原文来着。。。。一直存着justice没看。。。
【 在 mirror (井底之蛙) 的大作中提到: 】
: 我想针对你的反驳意见进行讲讲,不仅仅拘限于成本效益分析,因为它仅仅是现今的功力主义逻辑的一个版本。而是对整体的理论进行阐述,针对那种认为把效率最大化当作法律和政策的基石的想法进行阐述
进来学习。。。
【 在 PrinceTao 的大作中提到: 】
: 就那个哈弗公开课里的一句话,不能理解
: i want to turn to your objections,to your objections not necessarily to cost-benefit analysis specifically,because that's just one version of the utilitarian logic in practice today, but to the theory as a whole,to the idea that the right thing to do,the just basis for policy and law,is to maximize utility.
: 下划线的necessarily感觉逻辑不通
: ...................